I guess this is fairly well known, but I just encountered it for the first time the other day and it rang me like a bell.
When I had no roof I made
Audacity my roof. When I had
No supper my eyes dined.When I had no eyes I listened.
When I had no ears I thought.
When I had no thought I waited.When I had no father I made
Care my father. When I had
No mother I embraced order.When I had no friend I made
Quiet my friend. When I had no
Enemy I opposed my body.When I had no temple I made
My voice my temple. I have
No priest, my tongue is my choir.When I have no means fortune
Is my means. When I have
Nothing, death will be my fortune.Need is my tactic, detachment
Is my strategy. When I had
No lover I courted my sleep.Robert Pinsky
Click here to watch a great little video of the author reciting this poem.
Overall, I think this poem is an excellent articulation of a Zennish philosophy of resiliency, self-reliance, and resourcefulness that is as practical as it is inspiring. However, I find the language about opposing the body and relating to it as an enemy problematic, to say the least, especially for those of us who were inculcated from childhood onward in the “no pain, no gain” approach to masculinity and living in a male body. As I’ve written previously:
I’d been treating my body like a mechanism for most of my life, a strange and mysterious other that felt external and separate from what I thought of as myself, an unreliable machine that suffered from all sorts of inconvenient problems and breakdowns that no doctor I’d seen could explain. I know now that this sort of separation and dissociation from the body is very common among men and boys in my culture.
I’d like to suggest that readers observe their own reactions to that passage of the poem (“When I had no Enemy I opposed my body.”) as they read it, and consider how it might conflict or correspond with their own assumptions, and with what their own experiences tell them, about how a man can relate most effectively to his body.
